California Federal Court Dismisses Claim Against Broker for Alleged Failure to Procure Business Interruption Coverage for COVID-19 – The National Law Review

D. C. Passes Comprehensive Ban of Non-Compete… by: David Barmak and Danielle M. Bereznay Is There A Fiduciary Duty To Consider Leaving California?

Background On June 26, 2020, the plaintiffs, entities that provide rehabilitative and medical-surgical services, filed a complaint in California state court against an insurer and an insurance broker.

On August 26, 2020, the defendants removed the action, asserting that the court had diversity jurisdiction because the plaintiffs were all citizens of California, the insurer was a citizen of Connecticut, and, while the broker also was a citizen of California, the defendants asserted that the broker was fraudulently joined and so its citizenship should not be considered.

The insurer further argued that none of the exceptions applied that would give rise to a heightened duty of care.

Paul’s insurance coverage practice includes advising and representing insurers in bad faith litigation and insurance policy disputes, including first-party property policies, general liability coverage, errors and omissions insurance, and media liability insurance.

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

Ir arriba
Abrir chat
Ir al contenido